It was a great pleasure to stand by the River Tyne at the
site of Chesters Roman Fort a few weeks ago and witness a salmon leap out the
water. In fact, my excitement was beaten only by that of the two men near to me
who had trudged to the riverside with rod and fly in the hope of catching one
of these beautiful creatures.
Salmon fishermen
catch these fish as they swim upstream to spawn, which is something they do all
year. However, most fishermen accept the end of October as being the time to
leave them alone so that salmon populations can recover. Maybe it is an
interesting irony (or maybe it’s because I need a rubbish segue) that the end
of October may prove to be the start of testing times for the Salmond of the
North, Alex Salmond, the leader of the Scottish National Party.
A few weeks ago it all seemed to be going so well. Salmond
had got Dave of Westminster to agree to a referendum on Scottish independence.
Whilst he had not got the two question deal he wanted, he had got Cameron to
agree to allowing 16 year olds to vote, a major coup as young Scots are
overwhelmingly in favour of the end of the Union.
However, the following weeks saw major issues arise, two of
which have struck at the very core of the SNP and their future plans.
Firstly, and for many SNP members, most importantly, the
historic view of the SNP on nuclear weapons seems to have changed. Traditionally
the SNP has been fiercely anti-nuclear, opposing nuclear weapons sites in
Scotland and even refusing to allow nuclear power stations to be built in an
independent Scotland. However, the issue of nuclear weapons, and specifically
membership of the pro-nuke NATO alliance, was raised at their conference 9 days
ago, with Salmond and other top brass arguing in favour. A vote was called, the
motion was passed and a lot of SNP members became disillusioned. In fact, two
MSPs, John Finnie and Jean Urquhart, have resigned from the SNP, stating that
they will vote in line with the Party on most things and are still pro-independence
but that they cannot support the new stance on nuclear politics.
All this may seem minor, but let me say two things – firstly
Salmond and others have changed a major distinctive of SNP policy. That takes
guts and has proven unpopular. Secondly, the loss of two MSPs has led to the
SNP majority in the Scottish Parliament falling to one. Now I don’t think this
is as cataclysmic as many others do, especially as Finnie and Urquhart have
promised to support almost all the measures that government recommends.
However, I do think it is bad PR for the Party on whom the pro-independence
cause all but rests. Many will be wondering why, if they can’t keep themselves
in check, should they be allowed to run a new country?
The other issue that has rocked the SNP in the last few days
concerns their leaders and claims surrounding an independent Scotland’s
standing in the EU. This issue was raised many months ago and at the time
Salmond and his Deputy Nicola Sturgeon (both SNP) said that legal advice had
been taken as to whether an independent Scotland would need to join the EU or
not. When pressed on this legal advice they both claimed they could not reveal
it due to it possibly being a breach of the ministerial code, which was
actually a fair enough excuse (the Ministerial Code of Conduct is different for
Scotland but basically asserts the same thing – propriety in their role – and so
Salmond and Sturgeon mentioned it so as to not use their position to make a sly
argument for independence, a cause which is clearly separate from their roles
in the government of Scotland).
This however did ruffle a few feathers and so the issue of
whether the SNP leader had to reveal legal advice went to court. The case cost
the taxpayer more than £12,000 and ended earlier this week when Salmond was
forced to admit that no such legal advice had been sought and therefore did not
exist. He has since referred himself to an independent panel to investigate
whether he acted appropriately. The issue has become a hot topic in Scotland, with
the Scottish Sun, which traditionally supports the SNP, branding Salmond ‘an EU
liar’.
The SNP therefore faces two challenges, the first to its
make up and policy, the second to the honesty and uprightness of its leader and
deputy leader. All this is hard to take with a referendum which, although still
roughly 2 year away (the date has not yet been set), is very obviously on the
horizon.
Debate warmly encouraged
About Me
- Mark Summers
- Hello! Welcome to my blog! I've long been convinced that I'm not interesting enough to blog but others have persuaded me to give it a try. My name is Mark Summers and I live in Newcastle upon Tyne in the UK. My interests include politics (name a country, I'll read about it!) and, as a committed Christian, theology. I've got a whole load of other things I'd write on though so I've added 'Stuff' to the name. Hopefully that will cover things! I've been writing for many years and will hope to share some of my old pieces along with entries on current events and my random ideas. I'm also single......
No comments:
Post a Comment