Changes
There is no doubt some changes have taken place, so I’ve now given Florida (29 EC votes) and Colorado (9) to Romney. I’ve also changed the voting status of West Virginia from a prediction to leaning to GOP, meaning I’m more certain this is the way that state will go. The other status change is Wisconsin to leaning Democrat, so again I’m saying the result there seems a bit clearer
My conclusion is a
win for Obama with 281 votes, just over the 270 votes needed
Reasoning
My first
prediction had Obama winning with 319 votes, well over the 270 needed. My
thinking then was that Obama didn’t need to win by much in a few states to get
a large majority (though still nothing like the whipping he gave McCain in
2008). And that is still true. However, the reverse is also a possibility –
Romney could scrape a few states to take it to the wire. And that seems to be
more like what is happening. Romney has managed to catch Obama on the economy
and to sow enough seeds of doubt in the minds of swing voters to make them
think that he has the answers and that the President will only bring more
trouble.
I suspect
this message will most strike home in Florida, with its large elderly
population, and in Colorado, where Romney has managed to move from a 5% deficit
in September to a dead heat contest. Indeed the races in Colorado and Nevada
are still close enough to mean any current poll results are well within the
margins of error. Romney’s route to the White House could well go through the
mid-West.
I think
Obama still has a fair chance in Florida, especially with its large Hispanic
population, but I’ve given it to Romney for now to make things more
interesting. I’ve also given him Colorado as I suspect his quick rise on the
polls there will continue unless there is a major hiccup.
So those are
my thoughts for now. As I said before, this is a hard and yet easy game to play
– you can put hours of research in and yet still recognise that everything
could change in a few hours, no matter in the
days left to the election.
Debate
warmly encouraged
Arizona
|
11
|
L
|
Colorado
|
9
|
P
|
Florida
|
29
|
P
|
Indiana
|
11
|
L
|
Iowa
|
6
|
P
|
Michigan
|
16
|
L
|
Minnesota
|
10
|
L
|
Missouri
|
10
|
L
|
Nevada
|
6
|
P
|
New Hampshire
|
4
|
P
|
New Mexico
|
5
|
L
|
North Carolina
|
15
|
P
|
Ohio
|
18
|
P
|
Pennsylvania
|
20
|
L
|
Virginia
|
13
|
P
|
West Virginia
|
5
|
L
|
Wisconsin
|
10
|
L
|
198
|
Romney
Alabama
|
9
|
Alaska
|
3
|
Arkansas
|
6
|
Georgia
|
16
|
Idaho
|
4
|
Kansas
|
6
|
Kentucky
|
8
|
Louisiana
|
8
|
Mississippi
|
6
|
Montana
|
3
|
Nebraska*
|
5
|
North Dakota
|
3
|
Oklahoma
|
7
|
South Carolina
|
9
|
South Dakota
|
3
|
Tennessee
|
11
|
Texas
|
38
|
Utah
|
6
|
Wyoming
|
3
|
154
|
|
+ 4 leaning = 186
|
|
+ 4 predicted = 257
|
Obama
California
|
55
|
Connecticut
|
7
|
Delaware
|
3
|
Hawaii
|
4
|
Illinois
|
20
|
Maine*
|
4
|
Maryland
|
10
|
Massachusetts
|
11
|
New Jersey
|
14
|
New York
|
29
|
Oregon
|
7
|
Rhode Island
|
4
|
Vermont
|
3
|
Washington
|
12
|
District of Columbia#
|
3
|
186
|
|
+ 5 leaning = 237
|
|
+ 4
predicted =
281
|
No comments:
Post a Comment